Tuesday, December 4, 2007

Ian's Naked Baby in a Bath Photos!

Of course we had to put some naked photos of Ian taking a bath on the blog! Isn't he just the cutest! For some reason he has a big buddah belly and then he has a tiny hip area...this makes diapering tough!
Ian is a little modest and is covering up his privates with his foot!

8 comments:

Princess said...

AWWWWW!how cute is this baby I know really cute!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

leyali said...

he is sooooooooooo cute and his penis is so cute and tiny !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Kingda Ka Rocks said...

I'm 14 and my penis is the same size

Steinn said...

Poor thing! Cute boy and generally nice shots, but he's circumcised! :-( He will never grow up to be a REAL man! I really don't know why parents molests their boys that way. Ignorance I hope, but most probably egoism! You really don't know how much harm you are doing! Here's a neutral web site. Read, learn and weep! http://www.cirp.org/

Steinn said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
cartoon cartoon said...

Yeah. You failed him MAJOR by not respecting his body. www.mgmbill.org No wonder America is known as Mutilation Nation! www.circumstitions.com If, or WHEN, he grows up to hate you it's justified. www.twitter.com/intactbydefault #i2

Bill Carter said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Paul Anderson said...

Leave his parents alone! He's an American boy and the majority of American boys were, still are, and still will all be, ALL circumcised! It's a rite of passage for American baby boys to have been born in a hospital and had a health & cleanliness procedure like circumcision done to have the mark of health, cleanliness, and civilization on his body! Not some gross cheese-dick born in a hut in a 3rd world country! The foreskin is redundant tissue like tonsils and the appendix, it is an evolutionary dead end that no longer serves a purpose. Humans hear clothing now when early man ran naked and could scratch hos penis running through bushes or thorns the foreskin provided protection to the glans of unclothed primitive early humans. We also used our appendix to digest raw meat before humans learned to COOK their food and no longer needed an appendix, we started to wear clothing and no longer need a foreskin! Removing it in no way, shape, or form affects or reduces sensitivity or pleasure. I KNOW this because I was circumcised at 21 as an adult for obviously cosmetic, social, and health benefits and 14 years later have NO REGRETS and am GLAD and thankful I had it done, I only wish my parents had me circumcised when I was born and saved me the teasing ans trouble. I had sex both with foreskin and without and without is BETTER. If anything the head becomes MORE sensitive, but you can last longer and have greater control during sex. It never smells like foreskin does. Sex partners are more willing to give oral. It is cleaner. It DOES make it easier to clean for both children and adults. Reduces the chance of contracting HIV by at least 50%. Makes boys look like their circumcised fathers, brothers, cousins, friends, and male peers and classmates. And socially more accepted in a country where circumcised boys are the norm. Circumcisions are practiced in 1st world countries more for health benefits, family tradition, and social conformity than religious reasons! The ONLY reason circumcision rats have dropped slightly in the U.S. is due to the MASSIVE influx of millions of Latino immigrants, both legal & illegal who come from 3rd world countries south of the border where they do not circumcise because only the tiny elite of rich families have it done and the rest who are poor don't have it done because they are born at home and could not afford it so their families and their social class have never practiced it. American baby boys, especially Caucasian American baby boys continue to be circumcised at a high and unchanging rate. Particularly in the Midwest where over 90% of the boys are circumcised. In my state Minnesota probably 99% of white males are circumcised, maybe 1 out of 100 white males are uncircumcised. The push for parents to not circumcise comes from a loud and vocal, but SMALL minority of radical activists. They spread a lot of false statistics about how many boys in the country were and now are circumcised, saying it is MUCH less than it REALLY is, and medical propaganda against circumcision made up by radical anti-circumcision doctors. And they try to debunk the benefits of it but the majority of doctors are pro-circumcision in the U.S. and other 1st world countries that preform it on their males. American boys my age, born in the late 70's were probably 99.9% circumcised because I only saw two other boys my age in my whole life who where uncircumcised like I was. And we were shocked to discover there were ANY like us. It was not fun being the only one to be different.