Ian is a little modest and is covering up his privates with his foot!
Tuesday, December 4, 2007
Ian's Naked Baby in a Bath Photos!
Of course we had to put some naked photos of Ian taking a bath on the blog! Isn't he just the cutest! For some reason he has a big buddah belly and then he has a tiny hip area...this makes diapering tough!
Ian is a little modest and is covering up his privates with his foot!
Ian is a little modest and is covering up his privates with his foot!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
19 comments:
AWWWWW!how cute is this baby I know really cute!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
he is sooooooooooo cute and his penis is so cute and tiny !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm 14 and my penis is the same size
Poor thing! Cute boy and generally nice shots, but he's circumcised! :-( He will never grow up to be a REAL man! I really don't know why parents molests their boys that way. Ignorance I hope, but most probably egoism! You really don't know how much harm you are doing! Here's a neutral web site. Read, learn and weep! http://www.cirp.org/
Yeah. You failed him MAJOR by not respecting his body. www.mgmbill.org No wonder America is known as Mutilation Nation! www.circumstitions.com If, or WHEN, he grows up to hate you it's justified. www.twitter.com/intactbydefault #i2
Leave his parents alone! He's an American boy and the majority of American boys were, still are, and still will all be, ALL circumcised! It's a rite of passage for American baby boys to have been born in a hospital and had a health & cleanliness procedure like circumcision done to have the mark of health, cleanliness, and civilization on his body! Not some gross cheese-dick born in a hut in a 3rd world country! The foreskin is redundant tissue like tonsils and the appendix, it is an evolutionary dead end that no longer serves a purpose. Humans hear clothing now when early man ran naked and could scratch hos penis running through bushes or thorns the foreskin provided protection to the glans of unclothed primitive early humans. We also used our appendix to digest raw meat before humans learned to COOK their food and no longer needed an appendix, we started to wear clothing and no longer need a foreskin! Removing it in no way, shape, or form affects or reduces sensitivity or pleasure. I KNOW this because I was circumcised at 21 as an adult for obviously cosmetic, social, and health benefits and 14 years later have NO REGRETS and am GLAD and thankful I had it done, I only wish my parents had me circumcised when I was born and saved me the teasing ans trouble. I had sex both with foreskin and without and without is BETTER. If anything the head becomes MORE sensitive, but you can last longer and have greater control during sex. It never smells like foreskin does. Sex partners are more willing to give oral. It is cleaner. It DOES make it easier to clean for both children and adults. Reduces the chance of contracting HIV by at least 50%. Makes boys look like their circumcised fathers, brothers, cousins, friends, and male peers and classmates. And socially more accepted in a country where circumcised boys are the norm. Circumcisions are practiced in 1st world countries more for health benefits, family tradition, and social conformity than religious reasons! The ONLY reason circumcision rats have dropped slightly in the U.S. is due to the MASSIVE influx of millions of Latino immigrants, both legal & illegal who come from 3rd world countries south of the border where they do not circumcise because only the tiny elite of rich families have it done and the rest who are poor don't have it done because they are born at home and could not afford it so their families and their social class have never practiced it. American baby boys, especially Caucasian American baby boys continue to be circumcised at a high and unchanging rate. Particularly in the Midwest where over 90% of the boys are circumcised. In my state Minnesota probably 99% of white males are circumcised, maybe 1 out of 100 white males are uncircumcised. The push for parents to not circumcise comes from a loud and vocal, but SMALL minority of radical activists. They spread a lot of false statistics about how many boys in the country were and now are circumcised, saying it is MUCH less than it REALLY is, and medical propaganda against circumcision made up by radical anti-circumcision doctors. And they try to debunk the benefits of it but the majority of doctors are pro-circumcision in the U.S. and other 1st world countries that preform it on their males. American boys my age, born in the late 70's were probably 99.9% circumcised because I only saw two other boys my age in my whole life who where uncircumcised like I was. And we were shocked to discover there were ANY like us. It was not fun being the only one to be different.
His parents had no right to circumcise him because he didn't consent to it. The parents should have left his penis alone and let him decide whether or not he wants to be circumcised or not at an age where the child would have the capability to understand circumcision. Circumcision of little boys is wrong period, but circumcision of adult men isn't wrong because they can give consent.
Boys should be allowed to remain uncircumcised/intact as nature intended. The owner of the penis should be the only one to decide how they want their penises to look. I'm one of those that wish my penis should've been left up to me to decide whether or not to mutilate my own penis. Contrary to previous posters...the foreskin DOES serve a purpose (that being to protect the ultra-sensitive glans/head/tip) and should be left alone and attached to the owner! Like many American males, we SHOULD be allowed to have a say in how our penises are, be it intact or mutilated to conform to others' ideals of what a penis should look like, and shouldn't be altered to please anyone else! Period!
I can say this much as someone who wasnt circumcised til later in my life I wish I had been earlier woulda solved alot of my problems plus I personally think it looks better anyways
Poor little guy. You have no right to mutilate his penis.
I agree, hygiene and fringe health benefits cannot be ignored. I lived with a foreskin for a long time and there was nothing magical about it. Probably 90% of white and black guys are cut, even many latinos. I was in the military and rarely saw a foreskin.
im 12 and my pee pee is smaller 🤪
Nice pics
I wish I could see more
His penis is so adorable great parenting
Unknowns rant about why circumcising infants is beneficial has no scientific basis whatsoever. Claiming the circumcision rate is that high is not supported by the scientific evidence proving otherwise. The original article that led to the uprising of circumcision in the U.S. was written not by a paediatrician but by a doctor specialising in bones. The foreskin is designed to protect from the very problems that removing it expose boys to. Saying that boys should have it done so they don’t feel different is stupid would you want to get his tongue pierced to make him fit in. No doubt I will be labelled as one of the minority activists but I’m not a minority I just don’t believe in child abuse being normalised. Female circumcision is disgusting to all yet we don’t give the same rights to boys. Because people have spent years being fed lies and are like sheep following the herd to be the same. I should also point out my son’s and grandson’s are all circumcised due to a inherited medical condition so I have experience of both. They have had more complications than any of our uncircumcised family members. To also claim it’s a good way to reduce HIV infection is dangerous try teaching them basic hygiene and sex education it’s far more effective. I would like to point out none of my comments are aimed at the parents of this child I have no issue with their choice. We don’t know why the decision was made but he was obviously a happy well loved baby so well done. What I can’t stand is the same tired lies being used to justify the continued unnecessary mutilation of boys.
Post a Comment